In Spicer v. Earl, 41 Mich. 191, 1 N.W. 923, Judge COOLEY held that a minor was bound by his executed contract of service if it was reasonable under all the circumstances or not so unreasonable as to be evidence of fraud or undue advantage.
Summary of this case from Pankas v. BellNo. D-238.
June 19, 1962. Rehearing Denied August 3, 1962.
Appeal from Circuit Court, St. Johns County; P.B. Revels, Judge.
Affirmed.
In Spicer v. Earl, 41 Mich. 191, 1 N.W. 923, Judge COOLEY held that a minor was bound by his executed contract of service if it was reasonable under all the circumstances or not so unreasonable as to be evidence of fraud or undue advantage.
Summary of this case from Pankas v. BellFull title:ROLAND F. SPICER, APPELLANT, v. J. EARL MICKLER, APPELLEE
Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Date published: Aug 3, 1962
"The mere fact that a cause of action grows out of or is connected with a contract will not shield an infant…
Hall v. ButterfieldTo protect them from fraud and imposition, to which from their want of understanding and immaturity of…