From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sperling v. Inecto, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1932
237 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

December, 1932.


Order modified so as to provide that the examination be had as to all the items enumerated in the notice and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellants; examination to proceed on five days' notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sperling v. Inecto, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1932
237 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Sperling v. Inecto, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RAENOLA SPERLING, Appellant, v. INECTO, INC., Respondent. HARRY SPERLING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1932

Citations

237 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)