From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spencer v. United States Bureau of Prisons

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Apr 11, 2022
No. 21-3490 (8th Cir. Apr. 11, 2022)

Opinion

21-3490

04-11-2022

Antwoyn Terrell Spencer Plaintiff-Appellant v. United States Bureau of Prisons; Warden J. Fikes; Captain Warlick; Lieutenant Weber; Lieutenant Daniel Gravdahl; Officer G. White Defendants-Appellees


Unpublished

Submitted: April 6, 2022

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Antwoyn Spencer appeals after the district court dismissed his pro se civil rights action without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. After careful review of the record and the parties' arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See King v. Iowa Dep't of Corr., 598 F.3d 1051, 1052 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing de novo dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable Nancy E. Brasel, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Katherine M. Menendez, then United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now United States District Judge.


Summaries of

Spencer v. United States Bureau of Prisons

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Apr 11, 2022
No. 21-3490 (8th Cir. Apr. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Spencer v. United States Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:Antwoyn Terrell Spencer Plaintiff-Appellant v. United States Bureau of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Apr 11, 2022

Citations

No. 21-3490 (8th Cir. Apr. 11, 2022)

Citing Cases

Shane v. Bio-Techne Corp.

“Ordinarily, courts do not resolve affirmative defenses at the motion-to-dismiss phase unless the…