From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Specialists Entm't, Inc. v. Moore

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 4, 2014
115 A.D.3d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-03-4

SPECIALISTS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Alecia MOORE, previously known as Pink, et al., Defendants–Appellants, Recording Industry Association of America, Amicus Curiae.

Dechert LLP, New York (Benjamin E. Rosenberg of counsel), for appellants. Motta & Krents, New York (Anthony Motta of counsel), for respondent.


Dechert LLP, New York (Benjamin E. Rosenberg of counsel), for appellants. Motta & Krents, New York (Anthony Motta of counsel), for respondent.
Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., New York (Thomas Kjellberg of counsel), for amicus curiae.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered on or about September 20, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff's cross motion to amend its complaint to add a claim for breach of contract as a third-party beneficiary as against defendant Sony Music Holdings, Inc., unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the cross motion denied, and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiff cannot assert a claim as a third-party beneficiary of a letter agreement between defendants Moore and Sony. The agreement, requesting and authorizing Sony to deduct a portion of royalties payable to Moore and to pay them directly to plaintiff, by its express terms, negates any intent to permit enforcement by third-parties ( see Mendel v. Henry Phipps Plaza W., Inc., 6 N.Y.3d 783, 786, 811 N.Y.S.2d 294, 844 N.E.2d 748 [2000];Board of Mgrs. of Alexandria Condominium v. Broadway/72nd Assoc., 285 A.D.2d 422, 424, 729 N.Y.S.2d 16 [1st Dept.2001] ). TOM, J.P., FRIEDMAN, ACOSTA, ANDRIAS, RICHTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Specialists Entm't, Inc. v. Moore

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 4, 2014
115 A.D.3d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Specialists Entm't, Inc. v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:SPECIALISTS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Alecia MOORE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 4, 2014

Citations

115 A.D.3d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
115 A.D.3d 424
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1423

Citing Cases

Freidman v. N.Y.C. Taxi & Limousine Comm'n

Board of Managers of Alexandria Condominium v Broadway/72nd Associates, 285 AD2d 422, 424-25 (1st Dept 2001).…

Freidman v. N.Y.C. Taxi & Limousine Comm'n

TLC reasonably disregarded a prospective 30–cent surcharge, and its response to a Freedom of Information Law…