From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Speach v. Bouchard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 28, 2001
286 A.D.2d 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(1198.1) CA 01-00936.

September 28, 2001.

(Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Nicholson, J. — Summary Judgment.)

PRESENT: WISNER, J.P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, KEHOE AND BURNS, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly granted the motion of third-party defendants, Town of Schroeppel (Town) and Neil Candee, the Town's employee, seeking summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint for contribution ( see, Guereschi v. Bouchard, 286 A.D.2d 997 [decided herewith]). The contention of third-party plaintiffs that the Town and Candee are liable pursuant to General Municipal Law §§ 50-a and 50-b for the negligence of Candee is raised for the first time on appeal and therefore is not properly before us ( see, Ciesinski v. Town of Aurora, 202 A.D.2d 984, 985).


Summaries of

Speach v. Bouchard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 28, 2001
286 A.D.2d 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Speach v. Bouchard

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL P. SPEACH, PLAINTIFF, v. RICHARD A. BOUCHARD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 28, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 426