From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sparrow v. Evans

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 11, 1963
152 So. 2d 155 (Ala. 1963)

Opinion

2 Div. 436.

April 11, 1963.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Choctaw County, Wm. G. Lindsey, J.

Joe Thompson and W. H. Lindsey, Jr., Butler, for appellant.

Franklin C. Evans, Butler, for appellees.


Supreme Court Rule 24 requires that the organization of the court be shown at the beginning of the transcript for an appeal. A form for such showing is set forth in said rule.

Where the record fails to show the organization of the court, such deficiency is jurisdictional and this court must take notice thereof ex mero motu. McPherson v. Stallworth, 262 Ala. 367, 78 So.2d 924; Barnes v. Salter, 270 Ala. 110, 116 So.2d 748; West v. Camp, 264 Ala. 644, 89 So.2d 170; Tidwell v. State, 41 Ala. App. 296, 130 So.2d 206.

The record in this appeal fails to show the organization of the court.

We have examined the original record in Barnes v. Salter, supra. The statements in that record as to the proceedings below, and which were considered insufficient to show the organization of the court, are to all intents and purposes, the same as the statements in the present record. Of necessity, therefore this appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and MERRILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sparrow v. Evans

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 11, 1963
152 So. 2d 155 (Ala. 1963)
Case details for

Sparrow v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:Robert Moody SPARROW v. A. H. EVANS, Jr., et al

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Apr 11, 1963

Citations

152 So. 2d 155 (Ala. 1963)
275 Ala. 89

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

This instrument, or document, is totally lacking in efficacy to support an appeal. It is unintelligible, does…

Morrison v. State

The organization of the trial court must be shown at the beginning of the transcript for an appeal. A form…