declining to apply contractual choice-of-law provision because none of the parties were located in the chosen state and the transactions at issue bore no relationship to that state
Summary of this case from Enter. Bank v. Barney Ashner Homes, Inc.No. 06–1701.
2007-10-1
SOUTHWIRE COMPANY, petitioner, v. John Stephen JANOWICK, et al.
Case below, 470 F.3d 264.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
declining to apply contractual choice-of-law provision because none of the parties were located in the chosen state and the transactions at issue bore no relationship to that state
Summary of this case from Enter. Bank v. Barney Ashner Homes, Inc.Full title:SOUTHWIRE COMPANY, petitioner, v. John Stephen JANOWICK, et al.
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: Oct 1, 2007
While the plaintiffs contend that a right to receive demutualization proceeds accrued to the plaintiffs at…
Schoch v. Lake Champlain OB-GYN, P.C.By statute, "[e]very policyholder shall be a member of such corporation" ( Insurance Law § 1211[a] ).…