From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Iverson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Feb 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-2009-O (N.D. Tex. Feb. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-2009-O

02-29-2012

SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHIL IVERSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant Phil Iverson's Motion to Dismiss AT&T's First Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, Transfer to the Appropriate Jurisdiction or Compel Arbitration (ECF No. 37) and Defendant Feature Film For Families, Inc., All Things Family, Inc., Blue Skye L.C. and Vera L.C.'s Motion to Dismiss AT&T's First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 39) are DENIED to the extent that Defendants have relied on failure to adequately plead subject matter jurisdiction, the doctrine of primary jurisdiction, limitations, and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff is given leave to file an amended complaint within twenty days of this order in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Whether some of Plaintiffs' claims are subject to mandatory arbitration and forum selection agreements will be addressed by separate order to be entered in due course.

SO ORDERED on this 29th day of February, 2012.

______________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Iverson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Feb 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-2009-O (N.D. Tex. Feb. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Iverson

Case Details

Full title:SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHIL IVERSON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Feb 29, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-2009-O (N.D. Tex. Feb. 29, 2012)

Citing Cases

Baker v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon (In re Baker)

If the basis for a defendant's Rule 12(c) motion is that the claim is precluded by an applicable statute of…