From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Southside Bank v. Daniel

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 29, 1930
128 So. 779 (Ala. 1930)

Opinion

6 Div. 489.

May 29, 1930.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; William W. Walker, Judge.

London, Yancey Brower, of Birmingham, for appellant.

Where a tender is made, no statutory redemption of land sold in foreclosure of a mortgage can be had unless at the time of the filing of the bill the money is actually paid into court and there is an averment to that effect in the bill. Given v. Troxel, 145 Ala. 284, 39 So. 578; Murphree v. Summerlin, 114 Ala. 54, 21 So. 470.

Rudulph Smith, of Birmingham, for appellee.

Brief did not reach the Reporter.


Appellee's bill seeks to redeem real property after foreclosure of a mortgage or alleged mortgage; at least such is the alternative prayer for relief. The substance of the demurrer is that the bill does not show that appellee has paid or tendered to appellant all lawful charges due to be paid on redemption, nor has she brought the same into court with her bill, notwithstanding that appellant, on appellee's request, has furnished to her a written itemized statement of the amount necessary for redemption. Appellee's reply to this criticism of her bill is that it avers there was no consideration for the mortgage which purported to have been executed by herself and her husband, or, in the alternative, that she, having no other means of ascertaining the amount due and secured by the mortgage, made a written demand upon appellant for a statement thereof, that the itemized statement furnished to her contained claims of amounts largely in excess of any amounts that may have been lent to her husband on the faith of the mortgage, and that she does not know, nor has any means of knowing, what certain items of the statement mean. This we hold furnishes a good excuse for appellee's failure to aver payment, or tender, or to bring the amount secured by the mortgage, if any, into court with her bill. Francis v. White, 160 Ala. 523. 49 So. 334; Johnson v. Davis, 180 Ala. 143, 60 So. 799; Johnson v. Williams, 212 Ala. 319, 102 So. 527; Dorrough v. Barnett, 216 Ala. 599, 114 So. 198.

The decree overruling appellant's demurrer to appellee's bill is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Southside Bank v. Daniel

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 29, 1930
128 So. 779 (Ala. 1930)
Case details for

Southside Bank v. Daniel

Case Details

Full title:SOUTHSIDE BANK v. DANIEL

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: May 29, 1930

Citations

128 So. 779 (Ala. 1930)
128 So. 779

Citing Cases

Crumpton v. Campbell

8 C. J. 434, 929; McGowin L. Co. v. Camp Lbr. Co., 192 Ala. 35, 68 So. 263. Where an attempt is made in a…

Saenger Theatres Corporation v. McDermott

Kelly v. Carmichael, 217 Ala. 534, 117 So. 67. In redemption cases when the statement of the debt and charges…