From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Southland Corp. v. Edison TP

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Mar 31, 1987
220 N.J. Super. 294 (App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

Argued March 17, 1987 —

Decided March 31, 1987.

Before Judges GAULKIN, BAIME and ASHBEY.

On appeal from the Superior Court, Chancery Division.

Peter A. DeSarno argued the cause for appellants.

Lee M. Hymerling argued the cause for respondent The Southland Corporation ( Archer Greiner, attorneys; Lee M. Hymerling, John P. Hauch, Jr. and Christopher R. Gibson, on the brief).

Vincent D. Paragano argued the cause for respondents Roseanne Amendola, Amoco Oil Company and Amoco Corporation ( Vincent D. Paragano and Fran J. Garb, on the brief).


The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Keefe's opinion reported at 217 N.J. Super. 158 (Ch.Div. 1986).


Summaries of

Southland Corp. v. Edison TP

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Mar 31, 1987
220 N.J. Super. 294 (App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Southland Corp. v. Edison TP

Case Details

Full title:THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Mar 31, 1987

Citations

220 N.J. Super. 294 (App. Div. 1987)
531 A.2d 1361

Citing Cases

Upper Deerfield Tp. v. Seabrook

Therefore, the appropriate inquiry in a case of this nature is whether the Township ordinance enacted under…

Repair Master v. Borough of Paulsboro

18. Regulating hours of business operation, Southland Corp. v. Edison Township, 217 N.J. Super. 158 (Law Div.…