From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission of State of California

Supreme Court of California
Dec 14, 1916
174 Cal. 19 (Cal. 1916)

Opinion

S. F. No. 7962.

December 14, 1916.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Henley C. Booth, and A.L. Clark, for Petitioner.

Christopher M. Bradley, for Respondents.


This is a proceeding to review an award against petitioner made by the Industrial Accident Commission to Jessie Covell, widow of Marcus Victor Covell, on account of the death of the latter by reason of accident arising out of and happening in the course of his employment by petitioner.

At the time of the accident the deceased was employed by petitioner as an electric lineman, and was engaged in the removal of an overhead telephone wire which had fallen from its position down on to the trolley wire used by petitioner for the furnishing of electric power for the operation of its cars on a line of electric railway constituting a part of petitioner's passenger system, both interstate and intrastate, and in constant use as such. The facts bearing on the question of the status of this line as an instrumentality of interstate commerce are substantially the same, in so far as passenger traffic is concerned, as those in the case of Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission (S. F. No. 7845), ante, p. 16, [ 161 P. 1142], decided this day. It was necessary that this telephone wire be removed in order that cars might be operated, as it was impossible to operate cars over the line until such wire had been removed. As is shown by the opinion in Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission (S. F. No. 7818), ante, p. 8, [ 161 P. 1139], decided this day, deceased being thus engaged directly in removing an obstruction to the use of an instrumentality in actual use for purposes of interstate commerce was engaged in interstate commerce at the time of the accident. On the authority of the two decisions we have cited it must be held that the commission was without jurisdiction to make the award.

The award of the Industrial Accident Commission is annulled.

Shaw, J., Melvin, J., Sloss, J., Henshaw, J., and Lorigan, J., concurred.


Under the facts shown, the electrician was directly employed in repairing an instrumentality of interstate commerce. I concur in the judgment on that ground.


Summaries of

Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission of State of California

Supreme Court of California
Dec 14, 1916
174 Cal. 19 (Cal. 1916)
Case details for

Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission of State of California

Case Details

Full title:SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY (a Corporation), Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Dec 14, 1916

Citations

174 Cal. 19 (Cal. 1916)
161 P. 1143

Citing Cases

Southern Pac. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com

( SouthernPac. Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission, 174 Cal. 19, [ 161 P.…

Payne v. Industrial Accident Commission

An electric lineman employed in the removal of an overhead telephone wire which had fallen on the trolley…