From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Southeast Bank, N.A. v. Serignese

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 19, 1988
518 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-862.

January 19, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, George Orr, J.

Haley, Sinagra Perez, Fort Lauderdale, and Barry R. Cohen, Hollywood, for appellant.

No appearance for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


The action below to collect moneys due for credit card charges was transferred ex mero motu from Dade to Volusia County (the place where the defendants apparently reside) after defaults had been entered against the personally-served defendants for failing to respond to the complaint. We reverse the order under review upon a holding that there is no public policy reason to prevent the parties from agreeing, as they did, that venue of any action to enforce the agreement be in Dade County, see Fine v. Carney Bank of Broward County, 508 So.2d 558 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), and no reason, in the usual case (which this most certainly is), not to permit such an agreement to control the venue of the suit.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Southeast Bank, N.A. v. Serignese

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 19, 1988
518 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Southeast Bank, N.A. v. Serignese

Case Details

Full title:SOUTHEAST BANK, N.A., APPELLANT, v. DAN SERIGNESE AND DEBORAH SERIGNESE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 19, 1988

Citations

518 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)