From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

South Point, Inc. v. Krawczyk

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Feb 14, 2008
07-CV-576A (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2008)

Opinion

07-CV-576A.

February 14, 2008


ORDER


The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On January 25, 2008, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendant's motion to dismiss be denied and the removed action be remanded to the New York State Supreme Court.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Scott's Report and Recommendation, defendant's motion to dismiss is denied and the action is remanded to New York State Supreme Court.

The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

South Point, Inc. v. Krawczyk

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Feb 14, 2008
07-CV-576A (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2008)
Case details for

South Point, Inc. v. Krawczyk

Case Details

Full title:SOUTH POINT, INC., Plaintiff, v. JAMES M. KRAWCZYK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Feb 14, 2008

Citations

07-CV-576A (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2008)

Citing Cases

Windward Bora, LLC v. Ortiz

In failing to meet this threshold, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and the ability to grant…

Ostrander v. Unifund Corporation

See Prentice v. Apfel, 11 F. Supp. 2d 420, 424 (S.D.N.Y. 1998). While the court must accept as true all of…