From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

South Jersey Furniture Corp. v. Dorsey

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 433 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

1926

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, whose opinion is reported in 95 N.J. Eq. 530.

Mr. Elmer Brown, Jr., Messrs. Moore Butler and Mr. Patrick H. Harding, for the respondents.

Messrs. Endicott Endicott and Mr. Richard J. Mackey, for the appellants.


The decree appeal from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

South Jersey Furniture Corp. v. Dorsey

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 433 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

South Jersey Furniture Corp. v. Dorsey

Case Details

Full title:SOUTH JERSEY FURNITURE CORPORATION et al., respondents, v. WILLIAM T…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 1, 1926

Citations

99 N.J. Eq. 433 (N.J. 1926)

Citing Cases

Teitleman v. Porter Smith Co.

"`Assuming that at the time the contract was signed it lacked mutuality, in that the defendant could not…

Siesel v. Mandeville

Normally, a bill for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of land may be maintained by the…