From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soule v. Stanford

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 9, 2017
155 A.D.3d 1552 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

11-09-2017

In the Matter of Deborah SOULE, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Tina STANFORD, In Her Official Capacity as Chairperson of Board of Parole, Respondent–Respondent.

Law Offices of Joshua Dubs, PLLC, Buffalo (Joshua E. Dubs of counsel), for Petitioner–Appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for Respondent–Respondent.


Law Offices of Joshua Dubs, PLLC, Buffalo (Joshua E. Dubs of counsel), for Petitioner–Appellant.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for Respondent–Respondent.

MEMORANDUM:Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing her petition pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul the determination of the Parole Board denying her release to community supervision. Because petitioner has appeared again before the Parole Board during the pendency of this appeal, and was denied release to community supervision again, we dismiss this appeal as moot (see Matter of Ventura v. Fischer, 122 A.D.3d 1303, 1303, 994 N.Y.S.2d 879 [4th Dept.2014] ; Matter of Mann v. Fischer, 122 A.D.3d 1386, 1387, 995 N.Y.S.2d 526 [4th Dept.2014] ). We conclude that the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply (see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714–715, 431 N.Y.S.2d 400, 409 N.E.2d 876 [1980] ).

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, DeJOSEPH, and WINSLOW, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Soule v. Stanford

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 9, 2017
155 A.D.3d 1552 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Soule v. Stanford

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Deborah SOULE, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Tina STANFORD, In…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 9, 2017

Citations

155 A.D.3d 1552 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
63 N.Y.S.3d 281

Citing Cases

Williams v. Annucci

Consequently, this appeal must be dismissed as moot (see Matter ofColon v. Annucci , 177 A.D.3d 1393, 1394,…

In re Williams

Consequently, this appeal must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Colon v Annucci, 177 A.D.3d 1393, 1394…