From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soto v. Saif Corporation

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 22, 1993
860 P.2d 824 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

WCB 91-12369; CA A74702

Argued and submitted May 21, reversed and remanded for reconsideration on petition and on cross-petition September 22, 1993

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Edward J. Harri, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner — cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Stanley Fields, Salem.

John T. Bagg, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents — cross-petitioners. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Durham, Judges.


Reversed and remanded for reconsideration on petition and on cross-petition. Pacheco-Gonzalez v. SAIF, 123 Or. App. 312, 860 P.2d 822 (1993).


Summaries of

Soto v. Saif Corporation

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 22, 1993
860 P.2d 824 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Soto v. Saif Corporation

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Olga I. Soto, Claimant. Olga I. SOTO…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 22, 1993

Citations

860 P.2d 824 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
860 P.2d 824

Citing Cases

Vogel v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.

"Upon issuance of the Soto decision, the parties shall advise the Board of their respective positions…