From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soto v. Rosen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 11, 1995
215 A.D.2d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 11, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.).


Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate prejudice or that the limited discovery sought by the third-party defendants will unduly delay the damage trial or the balance of the action (CPLR 1010). Accordingly, the IAS Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the application to sever the third-party indemnity action (see, Shanley v Callanan Indus., 54 N.Y.2d 52, 57).

Concur — Ross, J.P., Nardelli, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Soto v. Rosen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 11, 1995
215 A.D.2d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Soto v. Rosen

Case Details

Full title:ENRIQUE SOTO, Appellant, v. ABRAHAM A. ROSEN et al., Respondents and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 11, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 443

Citing Cases

Seneca Insurance v. Certified Moving Storage

In exercising this discretion, the court examines the reason for the delay in commencing the third-party…