From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soto v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Feb 21, 2013
5:10-cv-00212-KGB-JTK (E.D. Ark. Feb. 21, 2013)

Opinion

5:10-cv-00212-KGB-JTK

02-21-2013

ROBERT SOTO, ADC #128324 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 112) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of February, 2013.

____________________________

KRISTINE G. BAKER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Soto v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Feb 21, 2013
5:10-cv-00212-KGB-JTK (E.D. Ark. Feb. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Soto v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT SOTO, ADC #128324 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

Citations

5:10-cv-00212-KGB-JTK (E.D. Ark. Feb. 21, 2013)