From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sorrells v. Hickman

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division
Aug 7, 2006
Civil No. 05-5075 (W.D. Ark. Aug. 7, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-5075.

August 7, 2006


ORDER


Now on this 7th day of August, 2006, come on for consideration the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge (document #33), and plaintiff's Objections To The Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge (document #36), and from said documents, and the pleadings in this matter, the Court finds and orders as follows:

1. That, as recommended by the Magistrate Judge, plaintiff's Complaint should be considered to be amended to assert both individual and official capacity claims against each defendant. It will be so ordered — and so considered.

2. That plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recommendation either do not fairly meet the substance of the Report And Recommendation, or they are otherwise without merit. Accordingly, the Objections will be overruled.

3. That the Report And Recommendation is thorough and sound in all respects. Accordingly, it will be adopted in toto. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff's Complaint be, and it hereby is, treated as being amended to assert both individual and official capacity claims against each defendant.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Objections To The Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge be, and they hereby are, overruled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge be, and it hereby is, adopted in toto. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge, defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (document #27) is granted, and this matter is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sorrells v. Hickman

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division
Aug 7, 2006
Civil No. 05-5075 (W.D. Ark. Aug. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Sorrells v. Hickman

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE HULEN SORRELLS, Plaintiff v. SHERIFF DANNY HICKMAN; DR. LYNN MAYO…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division

Date published: Aug 7, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 05-5075 (W.D. Ark. Aug. 7, 2006)

Citing Cases

Wilkins v. Ferguson

Thus, in cases where a pro se plaintiff has indicated in his response to a summary judgment motion that he is…

Campbell v. Hitchcock

As to the first requirement, serving salty chips, even ones past their "best by" date, and serving a lukewarm…