From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sorce v. Sorce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 18, 2005
16 A.D.3d 1077 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

CA 04-00463.

March 18, 2005.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Joseph D. Valentino, J.), entered January 27, 2004 in a divorce action. The order, among other things, awarded sole custody of the parties' children to plaintiff, exclusive use and occupancy of the marital residence to plaintiff, and visitation to defendant, and provided that each party is solely responsible for his or her own counsel fees.

Before: Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the last ordering paragraph and as modified the order is affirmed without costs, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Supreme Court did not err in awarding plaintiff sole custody of the parties' minor children with liberal visitation to defendant. "A custody determination by the trial court must be accorded great deference and should not be disturbed where, as here, it is supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record" ( Matter of Green v. Mitchell, 266 AD2d 884, 884 [citations omitted]). The court erred, however, in denying counsel fees on this record ( see Price v. Price, 113 AD2d 299, 309, affd 69 NY2d 8). We therefore modify the order by vacating the last ordering paragraph, and we remit the matter to Supreme Court for a hearing on counsel fees.


Summaries of

Sorce v. Sorce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 18, 2005
16 A.D.3d 1077 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Sorce v. Sorce

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG J. SORCE, Respondent, v. KAREN A. SORCE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 18, 2005

Citations

16 A.D.3d 1077 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
793 N.Y.S.2d 304

Citing Cases

Wideman v. Wideman

Contrary to the contention of plaintiff, the court did not err in refusing to award her primary physical…

Robert L. v. Jefferson Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs.

Contrary to petitioners' further contention, the court did not err in determining the issue of custody. Here,…