Soltysiak v. Soltysiak

Full title: NORBERT SOLTYSIAK, Appellant, v. DOLORES SOLTYSIAK, Respondent

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1985

108 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

February 14, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Prior, Jr., J.).

Kane, J.

A review of the record reveals no abuse of discretion by Special Term ( see, Bennett v Bennett, 105 A.D.2d 1047; Hyman v Hyman, 56 A.D.2d 337). As we have previously indicated in similar situations involving pendente lite orders, "a prompt trial is the most efficacious means to resolve any claimed inequities" ( Vallet v Vallet, 86 A.D.2d 741; accord, Corsell v Corsell, 80 A.D.2d 544). The order should be affirmed.

Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Casey, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur.