From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solomon v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of N.Y., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 9, 2016
136 A.D.3d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

162 110152/11.

02-09-2016

Robert SOLOMON, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. PEPSI–COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., Defendant–Respondent.

Law Offices of Stewart Lee Karlin, P.C., New York (Daniel Dugan of counsel), for appellant. Blank Rome LLP, New York (Anthony A. Mingione of counsel), for respondent.


Law Offices of Stewart Lee Karlin, P.C., New York (Daniel Dugan of counsel), for appellant.

Blank Rome LLP, New York (Anthony A. Mingione of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered on or about April 25, 2014, which denied plaintiff's motion for renewal and reargument of defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs, as to renewal, and appeal therefrom otherwise dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

Plaintiff failed to support his motion for renewal with new facts “ that would change the prior determination” (CPLR 2221[e]2 ).

Plaintiff's arguments addressed to the order that granted defendant's motion to dismiss are not properly before us since plaintiff failed to appeal from that order (D'Andrea v. Hutchins, 69 A.D.3d 541, 892 N.Y.S.2d 761 1st Dept.2010 ).

MAZZARELLI, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, RICHTER, GISCHE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Solomon v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of N.Y., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 9, 2016
136 A.D.3d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Solomon v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of N.Y., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Robert Solomon, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of New…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 9, 2016

Citations

136 A.D.3d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 889
24 N.Y.S.3d 506

Citing Cases

Raghavendra v. Stober

Since the plaintiff does not identify any facts that were not presented in connection with the prior motions…

E. B.-W. v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.

Were we to disregard the technical nonconformity and consider the affidavits, as the motion court did (see…