From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solomon v. New Era Mart

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 27, 2007
961 So. 2d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Summary

stating "it is the appellant’s burden to provide a record that will overcome the presumption of correctness as to the trial court’s findings" (quoting Smith v. Orhama, Inc., 907 So. 2d 594, 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005))

Summary of this case from Pomeroy v. Griffin Windows & Doors, LLC

Opinion

No. 3D06-2513.

June 27, 2007.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Robert N. Scola, Jr., Judge.

Marvin Solomon, in proper person.

Roland Gomez and Richard Gomez, Miami Lakes, for appellee.

Before WELLS, SHEPHERD, and SUAREZ, JJ.


Affirmed. See Smith v. Orhama Inc., 907 So.2d 594, 596 (Fla. 3 DCA 2005) (observing that it is the appellant's burden to provide a record that will overcome the presumption of correctness as to the trial court's findings and that "[w]here there is no record of the testimony of witnesses or of evidentiary rulings, and where a statement of the record has not been prepared pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(a)(3) or (b)(3), a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its face must be affirmed" (quoting Ahmed v. Travelers Indem. Co., 516 So.2d 40, 40 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987))); Lisanti v. City of Port Richey, 787 So.2d 36, 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (observing "[t]he elements for negligence are duty, breach, harm, and proximate cause; the additional elements for a claim of premises liability include the defendant's possession or control of the premises and notice of the dangerous condition"); Warriner v. Doug Tower, Inc., 180 So.2d 384, 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965) (concluding "[t]he plaintiff has failed to provide this court with an adequate transcript of the evidence and it must be assumed, therefore, that there was insufficient evidence to take the case to the jury in view of the order granting the motion for directed verdict").


Summaries of

Solomon v. New Era Mart

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 27, 2007
961 So. 2d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

stating "it is the appellant’s burden to provide a record that will overcome the presumption of correctness as to the trial court’s findings" (quoting Smith v. Orhama, Inc., 907 So. 2d 594, 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005))

Summary of this case from Pomeroy v. Griffin Windows & Doors, LLC
Case details for

Solomon v. New Era Mart

Case Details

Full title:Marvin SOLOMON, Appellant, v. NEW ERA MEAT # 2, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 27, 2007

Citations

961 So. 2d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Pomeroy v. Griffin Windows & Doors, LLC

Absent a full transcript, this Court cannot determine whether the evidence presented … at trial supported her…

Bechtel Corp. v. Batchelor

See Lisanti v. City of Port Richey, 787 So.2d 36, 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (observing: "The elements for…