From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solliday v. Umbach

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc.Page 501
Jun 24, 1957
313 P.2d 1005 (Colo. 1957)

Opinion

No. 18,147.

Decided June 24, 1957.

Companion case to Solliday v. District Court, 135 Colo. 489.

Writ of Error Dismissed

Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. William A. Black, Judge.

Messrs. HODGES, SILVERSTEIN, HODGES HARRINGTON, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. HANNETT, HANNETT CORNISH, Mr. LOWELL WHITE, Mr. WALTER A. STEELE, for defendant in error Paul H. Umbach.

Messrs. GORSUCH, KIRGIS, CAMPELL, WALKER GROVER, Mr. RICHARD B. HARVEY, for defendant in error Brookhaven Oil Company.

Messrs. ROBINSON, CHARLTON SCHREPFERMAN, for defendant in error Stanolind Oil Gas Company.


THIS action is a companion case to Solliday v. District Court, No. 18,148, decided this day. Reference is made to that case for the history of the litigation and the reason for this writ of error. We have held in No. 18,148 that the Rule to Show Cause there involved should be made absolute and a writ of prohibition issued to the District Court thereon. That proceeding is a determination of the issues in this action. Accordingly this writ of error is dismissed.


Summaries of

Solliday v. Umbach

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc.Page 501
Jun 24, 1957
313 P.2d 1005 (Colo. 1957)
Case details for

Solliday v. Umbach

Case Details

Full title:A. L. SOLLIDAY v. PAUL H. UMBACH, ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc.Page 501

Date published: Jun 24, 1957

Citations

313 P.2d 1005 (Colo. 1957)
135 Colo. 500

Citing Cases

Application of Umbach

Solliday obeyed the subpoena to appear for the deposition with the specified tax return copies, but refused…