Summary
holding that the evidence — that the defendant made a counteroffer and that the defendant appeared to be under his lawyer's control at all times — supported the defendant's claim that he would have accepted a plea offer if his attorney had not advised against it, and therefore that the defendant had shown that he had been prejudiced
Summary of this case from Best v. DrewOpinion
No. 88-1493.
June 26, 1989, October TERM, 1988.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Dellmuth v. Muth, 491 U. S. 223 (1989). Reported below: 863 F. 2d 1071.