From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snuszki v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 17, 2006
34 A.D.3d 1235 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Summary

affirming $1,000,000 for loss of parental guidance of two children

Summary of this case from Collado v. City of New York

Opinion

No. CA 05-01936.

November 17, 2006.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered May 2, 2005 in an action pursuant to Executive Law article 22. The order, after a nonjury oral, awarded plaintiff damages in the amount of $1 million against defendant.

Before: Present — Gorski, J.P., Smith, Centra and Green, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant, an inmate at Sullivan Correctional Facility, was convicted of murder in the second degree for causing the death of his estranged wife, Peggy Anne Bannach Wright (decedent), in 1988. Plaintiff, the daughter of decedent and administrator of decedent's estate, commenced this action pursuant to Executive Law article 22 seeking to recover, as compensation for decedent's wrongful death, funds received by defendant in settlement of an action against employees of the New York State Department of Correctional Services. We reject the contention of defendant that Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying his request for assignment of an attorney ( see Wills v City of Troy, 258 AD2d 849, lv dismissed 93 NY2d 1000; Morgenthau v Garcia, 148 Misc 2d 900, 903-904). Contrary to defendant's further contention, the award of $1 million to plaintiff and her brother does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation for past and future loss of parental guidance ( see CPLR 5501 [c]; Adderley v City of New York, 304 AD2d 485, 486, lv denied 100 NY2d 511). Defendant's remaining contentions were raised and decided in a prior appeal in this action ( see Snuszki v Wright, 1 AD3d 879, appeal dismissed 1 NY3d 623) and reconsideration of those contentions is thus foreclosed ( see Mobil Oil Corp. v City of Syracuse Indus. Dev. Agency, 224 AD2d 15, 19, appeal dismissed 89 NY2d 860, lv denied 89 NY2d 811).


Summaries of

Snuszki v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 17, 2006
34 A.D.3d 1235 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

affirming $1,000,000 for loss of parental guidance of two children

Summary of this case from Collado v. City of New York
Case details for

Snuszki v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:MELANIE SNUSZKI, as Administrator of the Estate of PEGGY ANNE BANNACH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 17, 2006

Citations

34 A.D.3d 1235 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 8409
824 N.Y.S.2d 519

Citing Cases

Viera v. United States

Finally, in Snuszki v. Wright, a husband of unknown age committed second degree murder against his estranged…

Murphy-Clagett v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re N.Y.C. Asbestos Litig.)

The defendants argue that they are entitled to receive compensation for the amounts Mr. Macaluso would have…