From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snipsic Company v. Riverside Music Company

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Jul 24, 1907
6 Cal.App. 115 (Cal. Ct. App. 1907)

Opinion

Civ. No. 401.

July 24, 1907.

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County. F. E. Densmore, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Howard K. James, and F. G. Hall, for Appellant.

Purington Adair, for Respondent.


This is a motion on the part of the respondent to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Riverside county.

The transcript of the record contains no certificate either by the clerk or attorneys of the correctness of the same, nor does it contain any certificate of the clerk or attorneys that an undertaking on appeal in due form has been properly filed, or waiver thereof. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 953; rule XI, supreme court, 144 Cal. xlv, [78 Pac. vii].)

Appellant has presented an affidavit averring "the said transcript as the same is now of record is in all respects true and correct," but the affidavit of appellant cannot be substituted for the certificate required by said section 953, Code of Civil Procedure, and the rules of this court, in the absence of which the judgment appealed from cannot be reviewed. ( Ellis v. Bennet (Cal.), 3 P. 801; Pacific M. Life Ins. Co. v. Edgar, 132 Cal. 197, [ 64 P. 260].)

The motion is granted and appeal dismissed, without prejudice to another appeal.

Allen, P. J., and Taggart, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Snipsic Company v. Riverside Music Company

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Jul 24, 1907
6 Cal.App. 115 (Cal. Ct. App. 1907)
Case details for

Snipsic Company v. Riverside Music Company

Case Details

Full title:SNIPSIC COMPANY, Appellant, v. RIVERSIDE MUSIC COMPANY, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District

Date published: Jul 24, 1907

Citations

6 Cal.App. 115 (Cal. Ct. App. 1907)
91 P. 747

Citing Cases

Kemp v. Murphy

As before stated neither the clerk of the trial court nor the [2] attorneys in the case have certified the…