From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snelling v. Snelling

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One
Jan 25, 1982
627 S.W.2d 900 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 12249.

January 25, 1982.

APPEAL FROM CIRCUIT COURT, JASPER COUNTY; HERBERT C. CASTEEL, JUDGE.

James F. DeNeen, Joplin, for petitioner-respondent.

Ross T. Roberts, Roberts Fleischaker, Joplin, for appellant.


The husband-father in this dissolution of marriage action instituted by the wife-mother in the Circuit Court of Jasper County, appeals from the decree of dissolution made and entered March 25, 1981. Two boys, Larry Kevin and Kerry Scott respectively 12 and 5 years of age at time of trial, were born of the marriage. By its decree, the court awarded principal care and custody of the older boy to the father and principal care and custody of the younger boy to the mother. As appellant, the father contends the court nisi erred in not giving him the principal care and custody of both boys.

We find the decree herein, reviewable under Rule 73.01, is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Also, we find that no error of law appears and that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).

References to rules are to Missouri Rules of Court, V.A.M.R.

GREENE, P. J., and FLANIGAN, J., concur.


Summaries of

Snelling v. Snelling

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One
Jan 25, 1982
627 S.W.2d 900 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Snelling v. Snelling

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA MICHELLE SNELLING, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. WALTER LARRY SNELLING…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One

Date published: Jan 25, 1982

Citations

627 S.W.2d 900 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Caywood v. Harris

No error of law appears and a protracted opinion in the normal form would have no precedential value.…