From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sneed v. Sowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Jul 25, 2013
No. 5:13-cv-184-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jul. 25, 2013)

Opinion

No. 5:13-cv-184-DPM

07-25-2013

COURTNEY SNEED PLAINTIFF ADC #119285 v. JAMIE SOWELL, Corporal, Tucker Unit, ADC; STEPHEN WILLIAMS, Warden, Tucker Unit, ADC; CHRIS CODY, Internal Affairs Investigator; GREGG E. MOORE, Captain, Tucker Unit, ADC; L. SKINNER, COII, Disciplinary Counsel Substitute, Randall L. Williams Correctional Facility, ADC; and RAY HOBBS, Director, ADC DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

Sneed's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). An in forma pauperis appeal from the this Judgment and the related Order would be frivolous and not in good faith.

__________________________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sneed v. Sowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Jul 25, 2013
No. 5:13-cv-184-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jul. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Sneed v. Sowell

Case Details

Full title:COURTNEY SNEED PLAINTIFF ADC #119285 v. JAMIE SOWELL, Corporal, Tucker…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Jul 25, 2013

Citations

No. 5:13-cv-184-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jul. 25, 2013)