From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snead v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 15, 1945
35 S.E.2d 319 (Ga. Ct. App. 1945)

Opinion

30956.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 15, 1945.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge Pomeroy. May 22, 1945.

Wesley R. Asinof, for plaintiff in error.

Lindley W. Camp, solicitor, E. E. Andrews, solicitor-general, Durwood T. Pye, contra.


The defendant was convicted in the criminal court of Fulton County upon an accusation which alleged that, in Fulton County, Georgia, on October 30, 1944, he "did wander and stroll about in idleness; was able to work and did not work, and had no property to support him, and further, that said accused was able to work, and did not work, and had no visible and known means of a fair, reputable and honest livelihood." The evidence tending to connect the defendant with the offenses charged was wholly circumstantial, and was insufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. His conviction, therefore, was contrary to law and the evidence, and the overruling of his certiorari was error.

Judgment reversed. MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 15, 1945.


Summaries of

Snead v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 15, 1945
35 S.E.2d 319 (Ga. Ct. App. 1945)
Case details for

Snead v. State

Case Details

Full title:SNEAD v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 15, 1945

Citations

35 S.E.2d 319 (Ga. Ct. App. 1945)
35 S.E.2d 319

Citing Cases

Blakeley v. State

The circumstances offered by the State to show that the defendant led an idle, immoral and profligate life…