From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snavely v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 8, 2015
No. C 15-03773 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2015)

Opinion

No. C 15-03773 WHA

09-08-2015

JOHN SNAVELY, Plaintiff, v. WILDA JOHNSON, Defendant.


ORDER RE MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court is in receipt of the report and recommendation by Judge Maria-Elena James (Dkt. No. 4). The deadline for objections was September 3. No objections to this report and recommendation were filed. This order A CCEPTS and A DOPTS the findings therein. Subject-matter jurisdiction is lacking. Accordingly, this case is R EMANDED to Contra Costa County Superior Court. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is D ENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 8, 2015.

/s/_________

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Snavely v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 8, 2015
No. C 15-03773 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Snavely v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:JOHN SNAVELY, Plaintiff, v. WILDA JOHNSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 8, 2015

Citations

No. C 15-03773 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2015)

Citing Cases

Chavez Valdez v. Field Asset Servs.

Whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists is to be determined from the complaint. See Snavely v. …

Tina Chiang v. Afifi

” Snavely v. Johnson, No. C 15-03773 WHA, 2015 WL 5242925, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 8, 2015)…