From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smyth v. Owen

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jan 23, 1918
108 S.C. 515 (S.C. 1918)

Opinion

9872

January 23, 1918.

Before WILSON, J., Anderson, Spring term, 1917. Affirmed.

Action for foreclosure of a mortgage of real estate. The amount involved was $10,000, and from an allowance of $800 as attorney's fee, the mortgagor appeals.

Messrs. McCullough, Martin Blythe, for appellant, cite: 84 S.C. 450; 94 S.C. 383; 104 S.C. 396; 105 S.C. 201.

Messrs. Bonham, Watkins Allen, for respondent, cite: 105 S.C. 200; 104 S.C. 397; 103 S.C. 299.


January 23, 1918. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


The question in this case is as to the reasonableness of an attorney's fee in the foreclosure of a mortgage. The amount involved was $16,000. The mortgagor put in a "general denial by way of answer, but when the reference was held to take testimony, witnesses were not required, and let the note and mortgage be introduced without formal proof." The referee and Circuit Judge awarded a fee of $800. From this allowance, the defendant appealed.

The appellant has failed to convince this Court that there was any error in the finding. The testimony was conflicting, but some of the appellants' witnesses based their opinion on the theory that there was no contest. At the last there was none, but the answer made the preparation for a real contest necessary. It is true the appellant says he was only fighting for time. He does not say that he notified the mortgage of that fact.

Under all the circumstances stated in the case, $800 is a reasonable fee, and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY and MESSRS. JUSTICES WATTS and GAGE concur.

MR. JUSTICE HYDRICK did not sit in this case.


Summaries of

Smyth v. Owen

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jan 23, 1918
108 S.C. 515 (S.C. 1918)
Case details for

Smyth v. Owen

Case Details

Full title:SMYTHE v. OWEN ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jan 23, 1918

Citations

108 S.C. 515 (S.C. 1918)
95 S.E. 109

Citing Cases

Hertzog v. Spartanburg Warehouses, Inc.

Suit by E.L. Hertzog, as conservator of the Mutual Building Loan Association, against the Spartanburg Bonded…

Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. Yarborough's Estate

Messrs. Hood Hood, Lyles Daniel, for respondent Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co., cite: Consolidation…