From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smock v. Hall

Supreme Court of Ohio, at Columbus
Feb 2, 2000
87 Ohio St. 3d 1250 (Ohio 2000)

Summary

stating that legislative changes to R.C. 3937.18 "defeated any viability that the Andrews reasoning may still have had"

Summary of this case from Post v. Harber

Opinion

No. 99-461.

Submitted December 15, 1999.

Decided February 2, 2000.

Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Geauga County, No. 97-G-2090.

Glowacki Associates Co., L.P.A., James L. Glowacki and Tammy G. Gibson, for appellants. Thrasher, Dinsmore Dolan, David E. Lowe and Heidi M. Cisan, for appellee.


The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

MOTION DOCKET


Summaries of

Smock v. Hall

Supreme Court of Ohio, at Columbus
Feb 2, 2000
87 Ohio St. 3d 1250 (Ohio 2000)

stating that legislative changes to R.C. 3937.18 "defeated any viability that the Andrews reasoning may still have had"

Summary of this case from Post v. Harber
Case details for

Smock v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:Smock et al., Appellants, v. Hall et al.; Motorists Mutual Insurance…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio, at Columbus

Date published: Feb 2, 2000

Citations

87 Ohio St. 3d 1250 (Ohio 2000)
722 N.E.2d 521

Citing Cases

Post v. Harber

The enactment of S.B. 20, however, effectively overruled both Savoie and Schaefer. See, e.g, Plott v.…

Cross v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

26} In response to these holdings of the Supreme Court of Ohio, the General Assembly passed S.B. No. 20,…