From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Walgreen Co.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Apr 4, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-cv-01940-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 4, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-01940-REB-BNB.

April 4, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before me on the following:

(1) Motion to Compel and Request for Sanctions [Doc. # 19, filed 3/13/2008] (the "Motion to Compel"); and

(2) Motion for Leave to Submit Additional Authority In Support of Motion to Compel [Doc. # 26, filed 4/3/2008] (the "Motion to Supplement").

I held a hearing on the motions this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record:

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Compel is GRANTED IN PART to require the plaintiff to execute and return authorizations for employment information for employment held after the plaintiff left the employ of the defendant. The authorizations shall be provided to the defendant on or before April 14, 2008.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a motion for protective order and proposed form of blanket protective order, if at all, on or before April 14, 2008.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Compel is DENIED in all other respects.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Supplement is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Walgreen Co.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Apr 4, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-cv-01940-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 4, 2008)
Case details for

Smith v. Walgreen Co.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK SMITH, Plaintiff, v. WALGREEN CO., a Foreign Corporation…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Apr 4, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-01940-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 4, 2008)