From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nov 17, 1964
338 F.2d 996 (6th Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 15730.

November 17, 1964.

John A. Bechtold (Court Appointed), Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

Boyce F. Martin, Jr., Louisville, Ky., William E. Scent, U.S. Atty., John E. Stout, Asst. U.S. Atty., Louisville, Ky., on brief, for appellee.

Before WEICK, Chief Judge, EDWARDS, Circuit Judge, and GRAY, District Judge.


Plaintiff-appellant had pled guilty to five counts of an indictment alleging sale and possession of marihuana and was sentenced to concurrent terms which produced a sentence of five years.

More than a year after sentence, plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to a "void indictment." The District Judge construed this as a motion to vacate sentence under Title 28, U.S.C. § 2255 filed on the ground that the two sale counts of the indictment were constitutionally defective in that they did not name the purchaser of the drugs.

The District Judge denied the motion, holding that "examination of the indictment reveals that it clearly charges the offense for which the petitioner was convicted."

Affirmed. United States v. Harry Lee Dickerson, 337 F.2d 343 (C.A.6, 1964).


Summaries of

Smith v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nov 17, 1964
338 F.2d 996 (6th Cir. 1964)
Case details for

Smith v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Robert William SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Nov 17, 1964

Citations

338 F.2d 996 (6th Cir. 1964)

Citing Cases

Dunham v. United States

Since the appellant is confined in a federal penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana, he claims that his…

Bush v. United States

This Court never followed the ruling of the Lauer case. See Smith v. United States, 338 F.2d 996; United…