Smith v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Full title: Lloyd SMITH, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW of…

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 18, 1980

409 A.2d 854 (Pa. 1980)

409 A.2d 854

Opinion

Argued December 11, 1979.

Decided January 18, 1980.

Appeal No. 613 January Term 1977, from the Order of the Commonwealth Court at No. 1086 C.D. 1976; Appeal No. 64 January Term 1978, from the Order of the Commonwealth Court at No. 624 C.D. 1976; Appeal No. 152 January Term 1979, from the Order of the Commonwealth Court at No. 1604 C.D. 1977; Genevieve Blatt, Judge; Appeal No. 159 January Term 1979, from the Order of the Commonwealth Court at No. 984 C.D. 1977; Glenn E. Mencer, Judge; Appeal No. 224 January Term 1979, from the Order of the Commonwealth Court at No. 841 C.D. 1977; Glenn E. Mencer, Judge; Appeal No. 271 Jannuary Term 1979, from the Order of the Commonwealth Court at No. 1275 C.D. 1977; Richard DiSalle, Judge; Appeal No. 514 January Term 1978, from the Order of the Commonwealth Court at No. 473 C.D. 1977; Genevieve Blatt, Judge.

Mark I. Weinstein, Jeffry L. Gilbert, Allentown, Harold J. Funt, Bethlehem, Lehigh Valley Legal Services, for appellant in No. 613.

Michael D. Klein, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees in all cases except No. 514.

David A. Searles, Community Legal Services, Philadelphia, for appellant in No. 64.

George R. Price, Jr., Susquehanna Legal Services, Bangor, for appellant in No. 152.

Germaine Ingram, Community Legal Services, Philadelphia, for appellant in No. 159.

Richard P. Perna, Community Legal Services, Philadelphia, for appellants in Nos. 224 and 271.

Peter B. Macky, Sunbury, for appellant in No. 514.

Charles G. Hasson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee in No. 514.

Before EAGEN, C. J., and O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN and FLAHERTY, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

After a studied consideration of the records, together with the briefs and arguments of counsel, we find nothing sufficiently persuasive to cause us to disturb the orders of the Commonwealth Court in these cases.

The orders 40 Pa. Commw. 1, 396 A.2d 480, 40 Pa. Commw. 11, 396 A.2d 94, 39 Pa. Commw. 404, 395 A.2d 675, 39 Pa. Commw. 408, 395 A.2d 667, 37 Pa. Commw. 73, 388 A.2d 1154, are affirmed.