From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Sep 6, 2012
53 A.3d 303 (Del. 2012)

Opinion

No. 344 2012.

2012-09-6

Walter L. SMITH, Defendant Below–Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below–Appellee.


Court Below—Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for Sussex County, Cr. ID 0105019765.
Before HOLLAND, BERGER, and JACOBS, Justices.

ORDER


CAROLYN BERGER, Justice.

This 6th day of September 2012, after careful consideration of the opening brief and the State's motion to affirm, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court's well-reasoned decision dated June 14, 2012. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant's fourth motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and that appellant had failed to overcome the procedural hurdles.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Sep 6, 2012
53 A.3d 303 (Del. 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:Walter L. SMITH, Defendant Below–Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: Sep 6, 2012

Citations

53 A.3d 303 (Del. 2012)

Citing Cases

State v. Travis

2012 WL 5577827 (Del. Super. June 14, 2012). State v. Smith, 53 A.3d 303, 2012 WL 3870567 (Del. 2012)(Table).…

State v. Folks

2012 WL 5577827 (Del. Super. June 14, 2012). State v. Smith, 53 A.3d 303, 2012 WL 3870567 (Del. 2012)(Table).…