From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Nov 29, 1983
441 So. 2d 1062 (Ala. Crim. App. 1983)

Opinion

4 Div. 226.

November 29, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Russell County, Paul Jack Miller, Jr., J.

Julius H. Hunter, Jr., Phenix City, for appellant.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., for appellee.


Nathan Smith, the appellant, pled guilty to burglary in the third degree and was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment. His conviction must be reversed because his plea of guilty was not entered in compliance with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). For this reason, the Attorney General has declined to file a brief. Boykin requires that an accused must be informed of the maximum and minimum possible sentence "as an absolute constitutional prerequisite to acceptance of a guilty plea." Carter v. State, 291 Ala. 83, 85, 277 So.2d 896 (1973).

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Nov 29, 1983
441 So. 2d 1062 (Ala. Crim. App. 1983)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:Nathan SMITH v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Nov 29, 1983

Citations

441 So. 2d 1062 (Ala. Crim. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Looney v. State

Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), "requires that an accused must be…

Lewis v. State

Any time the minimum and maximum sentences are incorrectly stated to an accused, then presumably he does not…