From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION II
Feb 17, 1998
961 S.W.2d 943 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

Nos. 72216 72245

FILED: February 17, 1998

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CAPE GIRARDEAU COUNTY, HONORABLE JOHN W. GRIMM.

Susan McGraugh, Asst. Public Defender, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 410, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, John M. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for respondent.

Before: Kathianne Knaup Crane, P.J., Mary Rhodes Russell, J., and James R. Dowd, J.



ORDER

Movant appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION II
Feb 17, 1998
961 S.W.2d 943 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Appellant, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION II

Date published: Feb 17, 1998

Citations

961 S.W.2d 943 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)