Opinion
No. 708-94.
October 26, 1994.
Appeal from 178th Judicial District Court, Harris County, William T. Harmon, J.
With these comments, I concur in the majority's refusal of appellant's petition for discretionary review.
Appellant's ground for review states:
Is the evidence sufficient to sustain a conviction for possession of a controlled substance when the State does not have a valid scientific test identifying the controlled substance and therefore relies on a field test conducted by a non-expert.