From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 7, 1991
575 So. 2d 776 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-408.

March 7, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Volusia County, R. Michael Hutcheson, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Michele A. Lucas, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Judy Taylor Rush, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


The appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying appellant's motion for Judgment of Acquittal based upon the defense of entrapment as a matter of law. We disagree. Entrapment as a matter of law does not exist where police activity (1) has as its end the interruption of a specific ongoing criminal activity, and (2) utilizes means reasonably tailored to apprehend those involved in [the ongoing] criminal activity. Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla. 1985), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905, 105 S.Ct. 3527, 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985). The facts of this case clearly establish that both prongs of the Cruz test were met.

AFFIRMED.

COWART and GRIFFIN, JJ., and ANTOON, J., II, Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 7, 1991
575 So. 2d 776 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLEON SMITH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 7, 1991

Citations

575 So. 2d 776 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

State v. Sargent

See Jeralds v. State, 603 So.2d 643 (Fla. 5th DCA), juris. accepted, 613 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1992); Ramos v. State,…

Simmons v. State

The Fifth District Court of Appeal has applied Cruz since the enactment of section 777.201, Florida Statutes,…