From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 23, 1997
700 So. 2d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Summary

reversing summary denial where defendant would have offered a reasonable explanation for presence of his fingerprints at scene, the only evidence tying him to the crime

Summary of this case from Jackson v. State

Opinion

Case No. 97-1509.

Opinion filed October 23, 1997. Disposition Thereof if Filed

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Nicholas P. Geeker, Judge.

Ronald E. Smith, pro se, appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Sonya Roebuck Horbelt, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.


Ronald E. Smith appeals the summary denial of his amended motion for post-conviction relief, in which he claimed that he was deprived of his right to testify by reason of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. In relevant part, Smith alleged that the only evidence directly tying him to the charged offense was the presence of his fingerprints at the crime scene, and that had he been permitted to testify, he could have offered a reasonable and innocent explanation for that fact. The trial court summarily denied relief, concluding that portions of the record attached to its order provided additional evidence to support the state's theory that Smith committed the charged crime, and therefore, Smith had failed to adequately demonstrate prejudice as a consequence of counsel's alleged actions. Having reviewed these portions of the record, we conclude that the evidence relied on by the trial court to deny relief was not so overwhelmingly indicative of Smith's guilt, nor was his proffered testimony so insubstantial that it can be held, as a matter of law, that Smith failed to establish prejudice as a consequence of counsel's alleged actions. Compare State v. Oisorio, 657 So.2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), aff'd, 676 So.2d 1363 (Fla. 1996). Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings. On remand, the trial court shall either attach to its order denying relief additional portions of the record conclusively showing that appellant is entitled to no relief, or shall hold an evidentiary hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

MINER, ALLEN and MICKLE, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 23, 1997
700 So. 2d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

reversing summary denial where defendant would have offered a reasonable explanation for presence of his fingerprints at scene, the only evidence tying him to the crime

Summary of this case from Jackson v. State
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONALD E. SMITH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 23, 1997

Citations

700 So. 2d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Santiago v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr.

of record, a postconviction movant must show more.” (citing Jennings v. State, 685 So.2d 879 (Fla. 2d DCA…

Jackson v. State

Here, Appellant alleged merely that he would have declared his innocence, rebutting the testimony of state…