From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Mar 27, 1987
402 N.W.2d 688 (Neb. 1987)

Summary

finding that where appellant's motion for new trial was filed seventeen days after the rendition of the divorce decree, and her notice of appeal was filed more than two months after the decree was rendered, the court did not have jurisdiction over her appeal

Summary of this case from Svoboda v. Kenney

Opinion

No. 86-566.

Filed March 27, 1987.

Appeal from the District Court for Seward County: BRYCE BARTU, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

Michael J. Elsken, for appellant.

David L. Kimble, for appellee.

KRIVOSHA, C.J., BOSLAUGH, WHITE, HASTINGS, CAPORALE, SHANAHAN, and GRANT, JJ.


A divorce decree was rendered in this case on April 18, 1986. On April 28, 1986, respondent-appellee filed a motion for new trial. On May 5, 1986, respondent filed a withdrawal of motion for new trial in which it is stated that respondent "voluntarily withdraws his Motion For New Trial filed in this matter."

On May 5, 1986, petitioner-appellant filed a motion for new trial. On June 9, 1986, a court order was entered as follows: "Petitioner's motion for new trial submitted and overruled." On July 7, 1986, petitioner filed her notice of appeal. Respondent has cross-appealed.

In Sederstrom v. Wrehe, 215 Neb. 429, 339 N.W.2d 74 (1983), in applying the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1143 (Reissue 1985) and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1912 (Reissue 1979), we held that a motion for new trial must be filed within 10 days after a judgment is rendered and that, in the absence of a timely motion for new trial, a notice of appeal to the Supreme Court must be filed within 1 month after the decree or final order.

Appellant's motion for new trial was filed 17 days after the rendition of the divorce decree, and her notice of appeal was filed more than 2 months after the decree was rendered. This court has no jurisdiction, and the appeal and the cross-appeal are dismissed.

We note that the procedures for appeals to the Supreme Court have been amended by 1986 Neb. Laws, L.B. 529, effective January 1, 1987, and L.B. 530, effective July 17, 1986. See 25-1912 (Cum. Supp. 1986). Those changes do not affect the result of this case.

APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Mar 27, 1987
402 N.W.2d 688 (Neb. 1987)

finding that where appellant's motion for new trial was filed seventeen days after the rendition of the divorce decree, and her notice of appeal was filed more than two months after the decree was rendered, the court did not have jurisdiction over her appeal

Summary of this case from Svoboda v. Kenney
Case details for

Smith v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN SUE SMITH, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. GAYLORD NEAL SMITH…

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska

Date published: Mar 27, 1987

Citations

402 N.W.2d 688 (Neb. 1987)
402 N.W.2d 688

Citing Cases

Zoet v. Zoet

[1, 2] Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1143 (Reissue 1989) requires a motion for new trial to be filed within 10 days…

Svoboda v. Kenney

nding that motion for new trial filed one day after the expiration of ten-day statutory period was…