From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 3, 1997
241 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

July 3, 1997

Appeal from the Herkimer County Family Court, LaRaia, J.

Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying respondent's motion to disqualify the Law Guardian. The record does not support respondent's contention that the children had conflicting interests precluding their joint representation by the Law Guardian ( see, Matter of Zirkind v. Zirkind, 218 A.D.2d 745, 746; Matter of Department of Social Servs. [Jennifer M.], 148 Misc.2d 584; cf., Matter of Brooke D., 193 A.D.2d 1100, lv dismissed 82 N.Y.2d 734; Matter of H. Children, 160 Misc.2d 298). Respondent's remaining contention is not preserved for our review ( see, Zankowski v. Johns-Mansville Corp., 204 A.D.2d 1023). (Appeal from Order of Herkimer County Family Court, LaRaia, J. — Custody.)


Summaries of

Smith v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 3, 1997
241 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Smith v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RONALD J. SMITH, Respondent, v. STACEY K. SMITH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 3, 1997

Citations

241 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
667 N.Y.S.2d 141

Citing Cases

Onondaga Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. John R. (In re Giohna R.)

The mother's contention that the Attorney for the Children (AFC) was ineffective because she substituted her…

Matter of King v. King

Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pigott, Jr., Balio and Boehm, JJ. Order unanimously modified on the law and…