upholding California's Anti-Piracy statute, which, in pertinent part, is indistinguishable from ours, as a valid protection of the public against commercial deception and as neither preempted by federal copyright law, facially invalid under the First Amendment, nor overbroad
Summary of this case from State v. MoghrabiNo. 94-1187.
March 27, 1995.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 F. 3d 1478.
upholding California's Anti-Piracy statute, which, in pertinent part, is indistinguishable from ours, as a valid protection of the public against commercial deception and as neither preempted by federal copyright law, facially invalid under the First Amendment, nor overbroad
Summary of this case from State v. MoghrabiFull title:SMITH v. RICKS ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 27, 1995
Defendant next asserts a facial challenge to the DMCA, contending that the statute is overbroad because it…
Sugarbaker v. SSM Health CareAlthough this appeal presents a question of first impression in our court, other circuits review a district…