From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Purnell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 20, 2012
475 F. App'x 464 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-1490

08-20-2012

CYNTHIA GAYLE SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TIMOTHY PURNELL, Defendant - Appellee.

Cynthia Gayle Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Mikhael David Charnoff, Danny Mark Howell, Courtney South Schorr, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-00922-JCC-IDD) Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cynthia Gayle Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Mikhael David Charnoff, Danny Mark Howell, Courtney South Schorr, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Cynthia Gayle Smith appeals the district court's orders denying her motion to amend her civil complaint, dismissing the complaint, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Purnell, No. 1:11-cv-00922-JCC-IDD (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2011 & Mar. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Smith v. Purnell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 20, 2012
475 F. App'x 464 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. Purnell

Case Details

Full title:CYNTHIA GAYLE SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TIMOTHY PURNELL, Defendant…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 20, 2012

Citations

475 F. App'x 464 (4th Cir. 2012)