From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Pina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 3, 2012
1:11-cv-1651-LJO-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2012)

Opinion

1:11-cv-1651-LJO-MJS (PC)

07-03-2012

ROBERT LEWIS SMITH, Plaintiff, v. S. PINA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS


(ECF No. 18)

Plaintiff Robert Lewis Smith ("Plaintiff") is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 24, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations, recommending dismissal of certain of Plaintiff's claims and Defendants. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff has not filed any objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 24, 2012, are adopted in full;
2. Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his failure to protect claim against Defendant Pina;
3. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Munoz, Sumaya, and Estrada be dismissed with prejudice; and
4. Defendants Munoz, Sumaya, and Estrada be dismissed from this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Pina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 3, 2012
1:11-cv-1651-LJO-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. Pina

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LEWIS SMITH, Plaintiff, v. S. PINA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 3, 2012

Citations

1:11-cv-1651-LJO-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2012)

Citing Cases

Munoz v. Cal. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab.

Plaintiff does not allege sufficient facts to show that Defendant Frisk was "aware of the reasons for the…

Daley v. Pelayo

” See Smith v. Pina, No. 1:11-CV-1651-LJO-MJS (E.D. Cal. May 24, 2012), 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72752, 2012 WL…