From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Pierce-Arrow Sales Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

June, 1928.


Upon the agreed statement of facts, it is adjudged that plaintiff is entitled to a lien upon the truck in question for the sum of twenty-two dollars and forty-one cents, with interest from November 30, 1927, and that the proceeds of the sale of said truck to satisfy said lien over and above such amount shall be paid to the corporate defendant. We are of opinion that, under the amendment to section 184 Lien of the Lien Law, effective April 15, 1926, the plaintiff, by permitting the truck to go out of his possession on November 30, 1927, lost his lien for goods sold and delivered and for services rendered Carpenter except for the period of thirty days immediately preceding November 30, 1927. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Laws of 1926, chap. 373. — [REP.


Summaries of

Smith v. Pierce-Arrow Sales Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Smith v. Pierce-Arrow Sales Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JACK P. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. PIERCE-ARROW SALES CORPORATION and CHARLES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1928

Citations

224 App. Div. 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Citing Cases

Yellow Manufacturing Credit Corp. v. Horowitz

The illegal seizure in New Jersey did not give defendants' possession which can be made the basis of a lien.…

Standard Motors Securities Corp. v. Yates Co.

The adoption by the State of the Uniform Sales Act authorizing conditional sales necessarily reversed the…