From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Georgia
Mar 22, 1966
148 S.E.2d 385 (Ga. 1966)

Opinion

23387.

ARGUED MARCH 15, 1966.

DECIDED MARCH 22, 1966.

Location of land line. Bryan Superior Court. Before Judge Durrence.

Ralph U. Bacon, for appellants.

C. L. Purvis, W. Roscoff Deal, Perry Brannen, Brannen, Clark Hester, for appellees.


Counsel for the plaintiffs and the defendants admitted in argument before this court that the plaintiffs own the lands on their side and the defendants own the lands on their side up to the true and correct dividing line between their adjoining lands, and that the sole issue for determination in this case is the true and correct dividing line between the lands of the plaintiffs and the lands of the defendants in each and all of the disputed areas. The Court of Appeals and not this court has jurisdiction of cases involving the location of disputed land lines. Ledford v. Hill, 206 Ga. 304 ( 57 S.E.2d 77); Whaley v. Ellis, 209 Ga. 147 ( 71 S.E.2d 209); Lively v. Thompson, 209 Ga. 425 ( 73 S.E.2d 90); Mote v. Seitz, 219 Ga. 208 ( 132 S.E.2d 79).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED MARCH 15, 1966 — DECIDED MARCH 22, 1966.


Summaries of

Smith v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Georgia
Mar 22, 1966
148 S.E.2d 385 (Ga. 1966)
Case details for

Smith v. Morgan

Case Details

Full title:SMITH et al. v. MORGAN et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Mar 22, 1966

Citations

148 S.E.2d 385 (Ga. 1966)
148 S.E.2d 385

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Douglas

Defendant appeals. Held: 1. Defendant (appellant) admits that the Supreme Court case of Colley v. Dillon, 247…

Colley v. Dillon

"The Court of Appeals and not this court has jurisdiction of cases involving the location of disputed land…