From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Matthews

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1932
165 S.E. 350 (N.C. 1932)

Opinion

(Filed 21 September, 1932.)

Appeal and Error A d — Appeal from order setting aside the verdict in the court's discretion will be dismissed as premature.

An appeal before final judgment which an appeal from the final judgment would include and protect is premature and will be dismissed.

APPEAL by defendant from Harris, J., at June Term, 1932, of WAYNE. Appeal dismissed.

Charles P. Gaylor and James J. Hatch for appellant.

Dickinson Freeman for appellee.


This is an action to recover damages for wrongful death caused by alleged negligence of the defendant. The issues of negligence, contributory negligence, and damages were answered in favor of the plaintiff. The court as a matter of discretion set aside the verdict as to damages. The defendant appealed.

"A premature appeal is one which is taken before final judgment, or upon an order affecting a substantial right which could be protected by an appeal from a final judgment." McIntosh's Practice Procedure, sec. 676(7). The present appeal is premature and will be dismissed. Chambers v. R. R., 172 N.C. 555; Joyner v. Reflector Co., 176 N.C. 274; Thomas v. Carteret, 180 N.C. 109.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Smith v. Matthews

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1932
165 S.E. 350 (N.C. 1932)
Case details for

Smith v. Matthews

Case Details

Full title:L. B. SMITH, ADMINISTRATOR OF PAUL SMITH, v. O. P. MATTHEWS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1932

Citations

165 S.E. 350 (N.C. 1932)
203 N.C. 218

Citing Cases

State v. Clarke

This is in no wise a final judgment, and in no way affects a substantial right which could not be protected…

Smith v. Matthews

" This appeal was dismissed as premature ( Smith v. Matthews, 203 N.C. 218) on the trial of the 3rd issue as…